Hmmm...
Taking a step following the strategery post in expanding the scope of this blog to the more theoretical and abstract issues in cricket, take a look at this extremely interesting article on cricinfo..
http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/wisdencricketer/content/story/244941.html
comments, anyone?
while on the subject of comments, what's with the silence following match reports? Come oun, guys, opinions and inputs are what make this blog worthwhile......
http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/wisdencricketer/content/story/244941.html
comments, anyone?
while on the subject of comments, what's with the silence following match reports? Come oun, guys, opinions and inputs are what make this blog worthwhile......
posted by koidy at 5:13 AM
3 Comments:
"...a legacy of hundreds of years of slavering over cover drives and delicate leg glides by writers hooked on the undeniable beauty of batting..."
hahaha whattay well fine!
So basically if batsmen can modify their strokes to create more runs whcy can't bowlers modify their actions to restrict? hahaha - thoughts for food
At first glance it seems like a brilliant argument and i think i'll have to read the article closely only if people disagree with me.
btw : http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/india/content/story/244910.html
No comment.
Heh heh.
Truly well said. A chuck may be quite okay as long as it doesn't take the batsman's head off.
But then what's the difference between cricket and baseball?
Post a Comment
<< Home